Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than HTC U Ultra, having an 87.7 score against 77. Galaxy M51 is a much newer phone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is thicker and notably heavier. The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
HTC U Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
HTC U Ultra has just a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.