Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than HTC U11, getting an 87.7 score against 77.6. Although Samsung Galaxy M51 is way newer than the HTC U11, it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. The HTC U11 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
HTC U11 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better memory for apps and games than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy M51 captures greater photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a much more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.