Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy M51 construction is newer, but thicker and way heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
LG G7 Fit has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. Galaxy M51 features more storage to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M51 has a bit superior processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy M51 takes much better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way more MP camera.
The Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 133 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.