Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a bit better than the LG G8S ThinQ, with an 87.7 score against 82.5. The Galaxy M51 body is newer than the LG G8S ThinQ's, although it is thicker and heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2248px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. The LG G8S ThinQ has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8S ThinQ features a little faster processor than Galaxy M51. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy M51 has a very superior battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3550mAh. Galaxy M51 counts with a way better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.