Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's global score of 82.7. Galaxy M51's design is newer than LG G8X ThinQ's, although it is thicker and a little heavier. These devices have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M51. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a just a little greater screen density.
The Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG G8X ThinQ features a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.