Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is slightly better than the LG K92, having an 87.7 score against 85.4. Despite being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is thicker and a bit heavier than the LG K92. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 operating system. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG K92. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
LG K92 has a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy M51, and although the LG K92 has a little greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a display of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy M51 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG K92, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same resolution camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
LG K92 features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery life than LG K92, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.