Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is much better than the LG Q8, having a general score of 87.7 against 77.2. Galaxy M51's design is incredibly newer, but thicker and way heavier than LG Q8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Galaxy M51 features a bit better processor than LG Q8, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The LG Q8 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels density.
Galaxy M51 shoots better pictures and videos than LG Q8, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also has a way more megapixels camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking much higher quality photos. The Galaxy M51 counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than LG Q8, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way better battery duration than LG Q8, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.