Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than the LG V10's global score of 78.6. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the LG V10, although it is a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a better hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V10 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V10 features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M51, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M51 takes better pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.