Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Galaxy M51 is much newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it is noticeably heavier and way thicker.
LG V30S ThinQ features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 features a much better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy M51 captures much better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot larger sensor and a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.