Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a global score of 87.7 against 81.3. Samsung Galaxy M51 is a way newer phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it is notably thicker and notably heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M51. Both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.