Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, with a score of 87.7 against 87.6. Galaxy M51's construction is just a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than LG V60 ThinQ, and both were only released 6 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has 10 version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11.
LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a bit larger display and a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same aperture, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rates. The LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.