Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than LG Velvet's 87.1 general score. Despite being the best we are comparing, Galaxy M51's design is thicker and somewhat heavier than LG Velvet. The LG Velvet counts with a little better performance than Galaxy M51. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
LG Velvet has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M51, because it has a little better quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG Velvet features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.