Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a little bit better than the Galaxy M51, with a 91.2 score against 87.7. Despite being the best we are comparing here, the LG Wing design is thicker and heavier than Galaxy M51. Both devices in this review include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). LG Wing counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a bit better pixels number per inch in the display and a bit larger display.
The LG Wing counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M51, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. The LG Wing counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery life than LG Wing, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. LG Wing features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG Wing also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.