Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M51's overall score of 87.7. These devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has newer 12 version while Galaxy M51 has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and optimized performance. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy M51.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a bit higher pixels number per inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy M51 counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy M51, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.