Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with an 87.7 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy M51 design is extremely older, somewhat thicker and much heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a sharper display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite better pixel number in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.