Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting a overall score of 87.7 against 81.9. Galaxy M51's construction is much older, somewhat heavier and thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a just a bit better screen density. The Galaxy M51 has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 62% more battery size.
Galaxy M51 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.