Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having an 87.7 score against 86.3. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy M51 body is way older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit better display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy M51, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lower video resolution and a back camera with a much worse 50 MP resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.