Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 general score. Even being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy M51 design is just a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the Moto G 5G Plus. The Moto G 5G Plus has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a just a little better pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy M51 and Moto G 5G Plus both have really similar CPUs, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a 40 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy M51 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.