Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. Although Galaxy M51 and Moto G Power were released with only 5 months difference, Galaxy M51's body is just a bit heavier but a bit thinner. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a bit faster processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto G Power and Samsung Galaxy M51 have incredibly similar screens, because although the Moto G Power has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2300, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy M51 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy M51 also has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery performance than Moto G Power, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.