Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G's 86.2 overall score. Galaxy M51's design is older, a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the Moto G200 5G. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has 10 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a slightly better screen than Galaxy M51, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Moto G200 5G has just a little better processing power than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy M51 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery performance than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
The Moto G200 5G's camera is just as good as Samsung Galaxy M51's camera, because although the Moto G200 5G has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.