Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black and White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, having an 87.7 score against 78.6. Both phones in this review use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. The Galaxy M51 body is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Power, although they were released with only 3 months difference.
Galaxy M51 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a better pixels density.
Galaxy M51 features a slightly better camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and a same size aperture, the Galaxy M51 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Moto G9 Power and Samsung Galaxy M51 count with extremely similar storage capacity to install games and applications, they have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features improved battery duration than Moto G9 Power, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.