Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a a lot newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it's a lot thicker and way heavier. The Galaxy M51 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of 2.2 GHz cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 100 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy M51 captures much better photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.