Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy M51 design is notably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy M51, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M51 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also has a much larger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.