Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy M51 body is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it's a lot thicker and way heavier. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M51 and Motorola Moto Z2 Play both feature very similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density. Moto Z2 Play has a bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy M51, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 133 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.