Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is much better than Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Galaxy M51 is a extremely newer phone than Moto Z3, although it's noticeably heavier and extremely thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Moto Z3 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Moto Z3 has just a little better performance than Galaxy M51, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy M51 has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy M51 also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more megapixels camera and a larger camera aperture. The Motorola Moto Z3 has just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.