Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting an 87.7 score against 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy M51 construction is newer than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's, but it's noticeably thicker and extremely heavier. The Galaxy M51 and the Moto Z3 Play both have very similar screens, because although the Moto Z3 Play has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy M51, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 has a bit superior processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.