Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy M51's body is newer than Motorola One Hyper's, although it is a bit thicker and a bit heavier.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy M51 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M51 and Motorola One Hyper have really similar screens, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Motorola One Hyper features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy M51 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a 64 megapixels resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.