Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s score of 87. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version. Even though the Galaxy M51 is better than Motorola razr (2020), we must tell that it is also just a little heavier and thicker.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger display, a little bit better count of pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Galaxy M51 counts with a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.