Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is better than the Nokia 9 PureView's general score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is newer, but heavier and thicker than Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a greater camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 111% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.