Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy M51 is a newer device, and it's also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little sharper screen than Galaxy M51. Both of them have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, a display with the same size and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy M51, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a lot lower 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy M51 has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.