Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide the same OS features. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a a little lighter and a bit thinner device than nubia Red Magic 5S, although both of them were only released 0 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 2 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy M51. Both have a greater pixels number per inch of display, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a display with the same size.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a back-facing camera with a 64 MP, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a lot better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.