Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than the OPPO Find X2, having an 87.7 score against 79.7. These devices have the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy M51 body is heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X2. The OPPO Find X2 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy M51 has just a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.