Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's general score of 77.7. Even being the best device in this review, the Galaxy M51 is a heavier and thicker device than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. These phones use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a little better processing power than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy M51 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos and a back facing camera with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 74 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.