Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 87.7 score against 83.1. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give you the same OS features. Although it's the best in this review, we must tell that it is also a a bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images in low light situations and a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 64% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.