Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 87.7 score against 77. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy M51 is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little faster processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little bit better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy M51 shoots a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, they both have the same video frame rates, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same video resolution. Galaxy M51 features slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.