Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, with a general score of 87.7 against 79.9. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it's also an extremely older, thicker and a bit heavier device. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a just a bit better screen density. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy M51 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M51 also has a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy M51 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.