Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy M51's global score of 87.7. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a thinner and lighter phone than the Galaxy M51, even when both were released with only a couple months difference. The Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy M51 have similar processors, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little better display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution, the same aperture and the same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.