Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little bit better than the Galaxy M51, getting a 92.9 score against 87.7. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Galaxy M51 were only released 2 months apart, the Galaxy A71 5G UW is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a just a bit better display pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better memory for games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy M51 features a superior battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 56% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.