Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than the Samsung Galaxy M51, with a general score of 97.6 against 87.7. The Galaxy Fold design is a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M51, but it is much heavier and was released about a year before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a display that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy M51, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1536 x 2152.
Galaxy M51 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a lot more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy Fold counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 60 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.