Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M51, having a general score of 90.8 against 87.7. Galaxy Note 20's body is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy M51, even when they were only released 1 months apart. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little better pixel amount in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has better 30 fps video frame rate and a way more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy M51 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 63% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.