Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Galaxy M51, getting a 98.9 score against 87.7. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Galaxy M51 were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is thinner and a bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy M51 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a higher display pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.