Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, having an 87.7 score against 81.2. Galaxy M51 is a way newer device than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but it is extremely heavier and thicker. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has a newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M51 and Galaxy Note 3 feature quite similar processors, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 119 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy M51 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also has a much bigger back camera sensor, a way better resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.