Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M51, getting a general score of 89 against 87.7. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note10 is older than the Samsung Galaxy M51, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution and a much larger back camera sensor.
Galaxy M51 counts with slightly more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.