Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M51's 87.7 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M51, even though it was released about a year before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy S10 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 features a sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a greater display density.
The Galaxy S10 counts with as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy M51 one, they have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 106 percent more battery size.
Galaxy M51 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.