Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy M51, having a score of 93.6 against 87.7. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and Galaxy M51 has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features. The Galaxy S10 5G is an older device than the Galaxy M51, but Samsung was able to build it a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Galaxy S10 5G features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a better display pixel density and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
The Galaxy M51 captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy M51 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 56 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.