Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M51, getting a score of 89.7 against 87.7. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a lighter and thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy M51, even when they were only released with a couple of months difference. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit greater screen density.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality photos and videos, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back camera with a way worse resolution and a tinier aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.