Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S10e, with an 87.7 score against 86.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy M51 is newer than Samsung Galaxy S10e, it is thicker and much heavier. The Galaxy S10e has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy M51 and Galaxy S10e feature extremely similar storage to install games and applications, they have the same internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M51 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.