Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M51's 87.7 general score. The Galaxy S20 design is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M51, even when both were released with only a couple of months difference. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S20 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 features a brighter display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy S20 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy M51 features a much better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera and better 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.