Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M51, having a general score of 93.4 against 87.7. The Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and noticeably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M51. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10.
Galaxy S22 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little higher screen density.
Galaxy S22 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M51, because although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. The Galaxy M51 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M51 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.