Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M51's score of 87.7. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy M51, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10, so it gives you some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy M51, because it has a higher pixel count in each display inch, a bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better video resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.